Kalamunda
A Brief History
Kalamunda had developed to its present form through three eras
The timber/rural era (1861 - 1902),
The resort era (1903 - 1950)
The residential era (1951 - present)
Western Australian colony was established on the Swan River in
1829, the Darling Range was largely ignored by pioneers.
The district offered little economic advantage compared
with fertile land on the coastal plain and the farming regions
east of the scarp. It was not until 1861 that development
albeit minor, occurred in the form of a 16 hectare allotment
for grazing purposes, taken up by Benjamin Robins in the
Gooseberry Hill area.
The rich jarrah forests east of the
Darling Range provided the first stimulus for settlement in
the area which is now the Shire of Kalamunda.
The first timber cutting licence was issued in 1864 for
260 ha. near Carmel. The licence was extended to 40,500 ha.
seven years later but heavy competition from mills in
Jarrahdale and an unreliable railway service brought about the
closure of the mill in 1882.
Two employees stayed in the area as farmers; one a carpenter named Wallis after whom
Walliston is now named. At about this time farmers were moving
out of Guildford and establishing orchards and running sheep
on fertile land in what is now known as Gooseberry Hill and
the Kalamunda townsite.
The real impediment to development was transport.
This was overcome in 1891 with the opening of a rail link to Perth and Fremantle
via a side link on the Perth - Midland line. This side link
ran through Maida Vale via the Zig Zag to Gooseberry Hill and
Kalamunda, Pickering Brook to Canning Mills.
This greatly increased the timber industry in the area and with the need of
agricultural produce to feed the massive population influx to
W.A. in the Coolgardie/Kalgoorlie goldfields boom era (1895 -
1904), Kalamunda and its surround developed rapidly.
In 1896 a separate Roads District from the rest of the colony was
created (controlled by the Darling Range Roads Board) due to
the peculiar needs of the physically isolated community. The
Board began building roads to connect the area more
efficiently with the rest of the colony.
Eventually the
Board became the local governing body for the area and oversaw
land subdivision and controlled building construction.
In 1901 the Kalamunda town site was
gazetted.
It's site was chosen by the residents
as it was (a) central to development of that day (b)
unsuitable land for agricultural purposes and was adjacent to
an established stop over for the train.
Cala-munnda was the name chosen by the settlers, which is a combination of two aboriginal words loosely translated to mean "Forest Home". The name was subsequently changed to its present spelling prior to the final declaration of the townsite.
The Resort Era (1903 - 1950)
The government take over of the
the railway in 1902, and the Annual Agricultural
shows that had been taking place in Kalamunda since 1897, were
two prime reasons in establishing the area as a resort
location.
At the turn of the century, the Premier of
W.A. Walker James, considered the cities of Perth (population
44,000) and Fremantle (population 23,000) needed a sanitorium
where people could escape from the bustling metroplis and
enjoy fresh air and relaxation. In assuming control of the
railway line the Premier remarked that the use of the
settlement in the hills as a sanitorium had concinced him that
the purchase of the line was in the best interests of the
State.
Land sales at the time reinforced the concept of
the 'country life - away from the city', but the return trip
by rail to Perth was slow (4.5 hours) and cost a minimum of
one third the daily wage, which precluded the commuter from
residing in the area. However, the blocks did sell as holiday
retreats, either weekenders or a significant number of
hostels, boarding houses, and convalescent retreats,
establishing Kalamunda as a holiday town.
Local
business responded and in 1913 resolved that as a group,
Kalamunda would be advertised as a "Health
Resort". In 1929 a Government Tourist Directory
described Kalamunda as "perhaps the most popular of the
residential townships fringing the western slopes of the
Darling Ranges".
The weekend shacks were generally
constructed on the smaller residential allotments within a
kilometre of the townsite. To attract the upper class (and
hence money) to the area, substantial buildings were erected to
cater for their needs. These quality houses were constructed
on allotments of 5,000 - 6,000 sq.m plus, and a substantial
amount of the surrounding bushland was usually retained on the
allotment, for health reasons.
Kalamunda Road was the main
link to Guildford and Perth, and with Gooseberry Hill became
popular for homesite's.
Properties adjoining the road were in
excess of 6,000 sqm and the houses were set well back from
the road with large gardens established in front of them. One
property ("Pasadena", at 50 Kalamunda Road), became widely
known and popular because of its magnificent garden.
The first building by-laws were enacted and being
enforced in 1919. These by-laws did not however restrict lot
size but the local authority did establish a basic policy in
1916 that allotments must be at least 2,000 sq. m (half acre).
This provision indicates the very early conviction that
Kalamunda should not become suburbia. The large allotment size
became a contentious issue with developers and in 1929 the
by-laws were amended so that subdivisions could be as small as
1,000 sq.m (quarter acre). Fortunately, this amendment was
only taken advantage of in the flatter areas of the district.
The need for larger lots on undulating ground, because of
building difficulties coupled with the buyers interest for
bushland settings, reduced the impact of this amendment on the
Kalamunda environment.
At the end of the Second World
War came the return of the soldiers, men now with skills in
managing large earthmoving equipment. Bulldozers were brought
into the State for the first time and the advent of this
machinery changed the face of the hills rapidly. Where before
it would take months of weary labour to clear 3 acres, it now
took less than one day.
Land was very cheap, about ten
pounds an acre, and well within the means of a worker with a
regular income, so, many after buying some land, took to it as
a livelihood and much of the eastern part of the Shire became
developed in this time.
With the increasing availability of
motor transport and good roads, Kalamunda's attraction as a
resort diminished and residents of Perth traveled further
a-field to Bunbury, Busselton and Albany to get away from the
city.
Kalamunda was now only thirty minutes drive from Perth. But with the decline of the resort use of Kalamunda came the acceptance of the area for residential use as it was now in commutable distance to Perth.
The Residential Era (1951 - present).
With the assurance of permanent water
supply in the very early 1950's, there was a great increase in
residential development.
With the exception of even
greater growth in the future, the Road Board realised it was
not adequately equipped to handle the situation and approached
the Town Planning Board of Perth in 1952 to get advice on a
zoning and subdivisional plan.
This work was carried out
simultaneously with the development of the Stephenson/Heburn
Metropolitan Region Report and resulted in the "Shire of
Kalamunda Town Planning Scheme" which was the first Local
Authority Planning Scheme to come into force after the
Metropolitan Region Scheme, in 1963.
Meanwhile in the
interim period (1953 - 63), the Road Board adopted and enacted
the principles and guidelines of the scheme.
This is
significant because it precedes the major period of rapid
growth in the shire. The implementation of the scheme had no
immediate impact on the district, principally because the
population was small and they had participated at all levels
through the development of the plan, however with the boom
growth in Perth, due to the discovery of rich finds of
minerals in the North, came rapid growth in Kalamunda.
The
coming of the the land developer also heralded problems with
the realisation of the planning scheme's one failure - it did
not set any specifications for minimum permissible lot size.
This fact became a clear problem for it had at times great
difficulty in maintaining its ideal 1900 sq.m (half acre) lot
size.